Recent Patent Cases and Generic Delays: 2023-2025 Examples

It’s 2026. You walk into your pharmacy looking for a cheaper version of your monthly prescription. The pharmacist says, "It’s FDA-approved. We just can’t get it." This isn’t a glitch. It’s the new normal.

Between 2023 and 2025, hundreds of generic drugs received final approval from the FDA - only to sit on shelves, unavailable to patients. The reason? Not quality issues. Not supply chain breakdowns. Not manufacturing delays. It’s patent litigation. Brand-name drug companies are using the legal system to stretch monopolies far beyond what Congress intended.

How the System Was Supposed to Work

The Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984 was designed to balance innovation and access. It gave brand-name companies 20 years of patent protection. In return, it let generic makers file applications years before those patents expired - as long as they promised to challenge any invalid patents. That’s called a Paragraph IV certification. It’s supposed to be a shortcut to lower prices.

But here’s what happened: instead of one patent to fight, generic companies now face 14 or 15 patents per drug. The average New Drug Application listed 12.3 patents in 2020. By 2025, that number jumped to 14.7. These aren’t all groundbreaking inventions. Many are minor tweaks - new dosages, packaging, or delivery methods. But under current rules, each one triggers a 30-month legal stay. That’s a federal pause on the FDA’s ability to give final approval, no matter how strong the generic maker’s case is.

The Real Bottleneck: Patent Thicketing

Drug Patent Watch found that 68% of all generic applications filed in 2024 included Paragraph IV certifications. That’s up from 54% in 2020. But here’s the twist: the brand companies aren’t just defending one patent. They’re filing dozens, sometimes hundreds, to create what experts call a “patent thicket.”

Take Humira. Its core patent expired in 2016. But AbbVie filed over 240 patents related to it. Each one triggered a new 30-month clock. The result? Generic versions didn’t launch until 2023 - seven years after the original patent ran out. That’s not innovation. That’s legal engineering.

Dr. Aaron Kesselheim from Harvard Medical School put it bluntly: “The current patent thicketing strategies have extended monopolies beyond the intended 20-year term by an average of 3.7 years per drug.”

Why Approval Doesn’t Mean Availability

The FDA approved 63 first generics in 2025. Sounds good, right? But according to a 2024 study in the Journal of Generic Medicines, the average time between FDA approval and actual market launch is now 3.2 years. For complex drugs like injectables and inhalers, it’s even longer - up to 4.1 years in oncology.

Why? Because even after the FDA says a generic is safe and effective, the brand company can still sue. And the law forces the FDA to wait. No matter how clear the generic maker’s legal position is. No matter how many patients are struggling to pay $500 a month for a brand drug that should cost $85.

Pharmacists are seeing this firsthand. A September 2025 survey by the Association for Accessible Medicines found 82% of them get daily calls from patients asking why their approved generic isn’t in stock. The top drugs? Eliquis, Trulicity, Steglatro - all with FDA approval but blocked by lawsuits.

Who Gets Hurt the Most

Patients pay the highest price - literally. Patients For Affordable Drugs Now documented 412 cases between 2023 and 2025 where people skipped doses or went without medication because generics weren’t available. The average monthly cost for the brand-name version? $487. The projected cost for the generic? $85.

Medicare Part D spent $3.2 billion more in 2025 because of these delays, according to the Congressional Budget Office. That’s taxpayer money going straight into the pockets of brand-name companies.

Small generic manufacturers are getting crushed, too. RBC Capital Markets found that 63% of delayed generics involved companies with annual revenue under $500 million. Legal costs? $12.7 million per case in 2025 - up from $9.3 million in 2023. Most can’t afford to fight. Big companies like Teva and Sandoz can. But they’re the exception.

Supply Chains and Other Delays

Patent fights aren’t the only problem - but they’re the biggest. Supply chain issues contributed to 37% of delays between 2023 and 2025, especially for injectables. The same PMC study found 14 out of 15 oncology drug shortages involved complex generics. But even here, patent litigation is often the root cause. Why? Because brand companies control the reference samples needed for testing. If they refuse to sell them - which they’ve done in dozens of cases - the generic maker can’t even begin the approval process.

The CREATES Act was written to fix this. It would force brand companies to provide samples. But as of September 2025, it was still stuck in committee.

What’s Changing - and What’s Not

The FDA has tried to speed things up. Its new AI-assisted review system cut review times by 22% for non-litigated applications. The National Priority Voucher program promises 1-2 month reviews for certain drugs. But none of this touches the 30-month stay. That’s controlled by courts - not the FDA.

Even the Orange Book, the official list of patents linked to drugs, is a mess. Dr. Patrizia Cavazzoni, director of the FDA’s drug center, admitted in May 2025 that the agency is working to clean it up. “We’re trying to prevent evergreening,” she said. But without Congress changing the rules, it’s like mopping the floor while the faucet is still running.

Meanwhile, the European Union moves faster. Their average time from approval to launch? 1.7 years. The U.S.? 3.2. Why? Because Europe doesn’t have the same 30-month legal pause. If a patent is weak, generics can launch immediately. In the U.S., they have to wait - even if the court rules the patent is invalid.

The Future: Will Anything Change?

There’s momentum. The FTC filed seven enforcement actions between 2024 and 2025 against companies using patent tactics to block competition. One case against Jazz Pharmaceuticals over Xyrem led to an agreement forcing earlier generic entry.

McKinsey & Company found 67% of industry stakeholders support limiting how many patents can be listed per drug. But PhRMA, the drug industry lobby, is fighting back hard. They argue any change would hurt innovation. But innovation isn’t about filing 240 patents on one drug. It’s about creating new treatments - not extending old ones.

And then there’s the political will. The 118th Congress didn’t pass the CREATES Act. The FDA’s new commissioner, Dr. Peter Bach, is pushing for more transparency in patent listings. If he succeeds, generic entry could speed up by 8-12 months by 2027.

But right now, the system is broken. Patients are paying more. Pharmacists are powerless. Generics are approved - but locked out.

The question isn’t whether generics can be made. They can. The question is whether the law will let them reach the people who need them.